![]() ![]() In other words, there is no proper accounting for the cost of securing the nation’s interests. In addition, the steadily rising costs of the Department of Veterans Affairs are not tied to any integrated plan for military personnel in the DOD. The Department of Defense (DOD) request does not have a matching national security section in the budget requests for the Departments of State, Homeland Security, or Energy. There is no integrated national security strategy of the kind called for in the Joint Concept for Competing. This failure is all too clear in the FY 2024 budget requests. The Need for a Truly Integrated Mix of National Security StrategiesĬurrent approaches to strategic analysis often fail to tie strategy to the plans, programs, and budgets across the federal government. Absent a revitalization of wargames, net assessment, red teaming, and data science-methods that stress analyzing alternatives and competitive decisionmaking-twenty-first-century strategy will remain a collection of hollow promises. Efforts to align the national security enterprise, such as the recent Joint Concept for Competing, stall inside a bureaucracy that struggles to translate concepts and goals into realistic plans and budgets. The result is inevitable: stilted progress and diminishing marginal returns. Moreover, it struggles to keep up with the rapid military and economic changes in rival states such as Russia and China. Strategic analysis has become too limited and does little more than set broad goals without describing how to integrate military power with other instruments of statecraft or assess their true costs. government to analyze national security fall far short of the requirements necessary to meet the needs of the nation. The current methods and processes used across the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |